Рубрика: HIGHWAY ENGINEERING HANDBOOK

Rigid Systems

The concrete safety shape system (Fig. 6.21), which has a sloping front face, is similar to the concrete median barrier (Art. 6.9.1) but usually has a vertical back face. The reduced cross-section of the roadside barrier version makes it more vulnerable to over­turning, thus requiring more reinforcing steel and/or a more elaborate footing design. The […]

Semirigid Systems

The box-beam (weak-post) system (Fig. 6.16) achieves its resistance through the com­bined flexural and tensile resistance of the box beam. Posts near the impact point are designed to break or tear away and distribute the impact force to adjacent posts. This system meets TL-3. The system is sensitive to mounting height and irregularities in terrain. […]

The three-cable system (Fig. 6.13) has been successfully tested to TL-3. It is made up of three steel cables mounted on weak posts. The cable barrier redirects impacting vehicles after the cable deflects and develops tension, with the posts offering little direct resistance. Several states allow a backslope as steep as 1:2 behind the rail. If the barrier is placed on the inside of a curve, additional deflection will occur before tension develops in the cable, and thus it may be desirable to limit the radius. New York installs the barrier having S3 X 5.7 (S75 X 8.5) steel posts for radii of 721.5 ft (220 m) or more with the standard 16-ft (4.9-m) post spacing, and for radii of 442.5 ft (135 m)

TABLE 6.2 Classification of Roadside Barriers and Approved Test Levels Barrier system Test level Flexible systems Three-strand cable (weak-post) TL-3 W-beam (weak-post) TL-2 Modified W-beam (weak-post) TL-3 Ironwood aesthetic barrier TL-3 Semirigid systems Box-beam (weak-post) TL-3 Blocked-out W-beam (strong-post) Steel or wood post with wood TL-3 or plastic block Steel post with steel block TL-2 […]

Obstacles

Roadside obstacles include nontraversable terrain and fixed objects, either constructed (such as culvert headwalls or structural supports) or natural (such as trees). Such obstacles account for over 30 percent of highway fatalities. The need for a barrier depends on both the nature of the obstacle and the probability that it will be hit. Table 6.1 […]

Embankments

As indicated in Fig. 6.12, the main factors considered in determining the need for barriers are the embankment height and the side slope. These criteria are based on studies of the severity of encroachments on embankments as compared with impacts with roadside barriers. The figure does not include the probability of an encroachment or relative […]